Attitudes towards working in organizations
This is an excerpt from Organizational Behavior in Sport Management-2nd Edition by Eric MacIntosh & Laura Burton.
Attitude
You have likely heard the word attitude used to describe a person; in fact, you may have used it in describing someone you know. Phrases such as “he has a bad attitude” or “she has a positive attitude” are often used to describe a person’s tendency to feel and behave in an unfavorable or favorable way toward a specific person, idea, or object. Like personality, attitudes tend to be relatively stable unless a person is provided with information that changes their perspective. For example, if you strongly prefer college basketball to the NBA, you are likely to continue holding that preference unless you are provided with important information that changes your preference.
Attitudes are directed toward a particular object, person, or idea. Therefore, if you have a negative attitude toward your internship in event operations, that attitude will not necessarily influence your positive attitude toward college basketball. It will, however, influence your behavior. For instance, if you prefer college basketball (attitude), you will watch it on TV or attend games in person (behavior).
In the context of working in an organization, people behave in ways that are consistent with their attitudes. This consistency can be problematic if an employee holds a negative attitude toward a coworker; for instance, that employee (let’s call her Sasha) may not cooperate with the coworker (Jesse) on a shared project. However, if a manager works to change Sasha’s attitude toward Jesse, then her behavior toward them may improve. In addition, attitudes can be changed by behaviors. For example, if Sasha must work with Jesse, she may realize after spending time with them that they care a lot about their work and are committed to doing a good job. This realization may lead Sasha to develop a more positive attitude toward Jesse.
Important Attitudes in Sport Organization Workplaces
Having described attitudes in general terms, we focus now on two important measures of attitude that are specific to working in an organization: organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Organizational commitment helps us understand how connected an employee feels to the organization and how they value being part of it. Job satisfaction, on the other hand, consists of the level of fulfillment that an employee derives from working for the organization. Both attitudes have been the subject of significant scholarship in sport management.
Organizational Commitment
Organizational commitment consists of a person’s overall attitude toward the organization, including how much the person identifies with the organization and values being associated with it. Strong organizational commitment involves adopting the organization’s view as one’s own, placing value on being a member of the organization, and being willing to work to help the organization achieve its stated goals (Meyer & Allen, 1991). This kind of commitment matters because it has been linked to reduced interest in seeking another job (i.e., low turnover intention), increased work attendance, and positive behaviors directed toward other members of the organization (e.g., willingness to help a colleague or stay after work to help finish a project) (Klein et al., 2012; Vandenberghe et al., 2004).
Organizational commitment has been studied in various areas of sport, including among coaches, volunteers, and interns. In one study, when U.S. collegiate coaches indicated low commitment to their occupation, they were more likely to want to leave the profession (Turner & Chelladurai, 2005). In another example, organizational commitment demonstrated by volunteers in sport organizations was linked to job satisfaction (Costa et al., 2006), job performance (Stephens et al, 2004), willingness to be trained (Kim & Chelladurai, 2008), and intention to continue as a volunteer (Park, 2010). Another study found that interns at sport organizations needed to be provided with challenging job roles to develop a high level of commitment to the organization (Dixon et al., 2005).
Commitment to work can also become detrimental to employees when their commitment leads to workaholism. Workaholism occurs when individuals work harder than they are required to and put much more effort into their work than is expected of them and as a result neglect their life outside of their work (Schaufeli et al., 2008). In college athletics, individuals who are workaholics tend to burn out at higher rates than other employees, which is harmful both for the employee and the athletic department. By decreasing employee burnout and workaholism, sport organizations can reduce employee turnover and reduce the need to recruit and train new employees (Taylor et al., 2019).
Sport organizations need to establish expectations for employees that reduce workaholism through both employee onboarding and mentoring early-career professionals because reduced workaholism benefits sport organizations and provides employees a healthier work environment (Taylor et al., 2019).
Job Satisfaction
Job satisfaction consists of one’s general attitude toward one’s job. It is important in terms of organizational behavior because, as you might expect, a person with higher job satisfaction is more likely to stay in their current position (Chelladurai & Ogasawara, 2003). Job satisfaction also exerts a moderately positive influence on an individual’s job motivation (Jalagat, 2016; Kinicki et al., 2002) and is moderately and positively related to job performance (Jalagat, 2016).
More Excerpts From Organizational Behavior in Sport Management 2nd EditionSHOP
Get the latest insights with regular newsletters, plus periodic product information and special insider offers.
JOIN NOW